|
Home | About
Us | Staff | Contact Us
Case List Summary: 1998
Brisbee,Larry A; Brisbee & Stockton (1998): Short v Inzer. Hillsboro,
OR. 97123.
Child ran into driveway and was struck by vehicle; Reconstruct accident; Determine
appropriateness of diver's actions relative to child's actions
[AUTO; COLLISION; DYNAMICS; EVALUATION; INJURY]
Crandall,Dwanye (1998): Mask v Schauer et al. Longview, WA. 98632.
[AUTO; DYNAMICS; INJURY]
Miller,Robert A (1998): Wyers v Pappel. Eugene, OR. 97401-6041.
Relatively low speed front end collision resulting in low back injury; Evaluate
and determine mechanisms consistent with injury
[AUTO; DYNAMICS; FRONT; INJURY]
Hochberg,Samuel I (1998): Conner v Starbucks. Portland, OR. 97205.
Human factors case; Woman walked into glass wall that gave appearance of being
a door; Issues included perception, expectations, recognition and warnings
[PERCEPTIONS; WALK; WARNINGS]
Zackheim,Ivan S (1998): Ino Aragon. Portland, OR. 97204.
Side impact rollover accident involving low back injury; Issue whether partial
seat failure was causitive in injury
[AUTO; BACK; INJURY]
Stubbs,Tyra H; King,John; Cantrill,Skinner,Sullivan & King (1998):
Ball v Brown. Boise, ID. 83701.
Low speed rear end impact; Evaluate claimed injuries and identify consistency
of injuries with force of impact
[AUTO; COLLISION; DYNAMICS; EVALUATION]
Pardee,LR; Met P & C (1998): Hidden (SE023502 DA). Bellevue, WA. 98004.
Reconstruct accident and evaluate consistency between claimed injuries and
biomechanics of impact
[AUTO; DYNAMICS; INJURY; REPORT]
Brand,Cameron; Liberty Mutual Group (1998): Harkins v Smith. Hillsboro,
OR. 97123-9553.
Evaluate low speed rear end impact resulting in potential cervical strain
[AUTO; DYNAMICS; INJURY; LOW SPEED; REPORT]
Thurgood,Harriet; Carolina Casualty Insurance Company (1998): Frazier
v Pioneer Executive Towncar & Limo Service. Jacksonville, Florida.
32203.
Evaluate potential for claimant's injuries in accident involving low speed
side impact
[AUTO; DYNAMICS; INJURY]
Hittle,David W; Burt Swanson Lathen Alexander McCann & Smith (1998):
Thompson-Hanson v McEwen. Salem, OR. 97301-3571.
Slip and fall case involving an uneven step; Investigate human factors and
design criteria relative to fall
[DESIGN; FALL; SLIP; STEP]
Stubbs,Tyra; Cantrill,Skinner,Sullivan & King (1998): Pena v City
of Nampa. Boise, ID. 83701.
Evaluate claimed injuries from moderate speed rear end impact
[AUTO; EVALUATION; INJURY]
Grebe,Gregory J (1998): T. Mikes. Anchorage, AK. 99503.
Analyze, evaluate injuries to individual in middle vehicle of three vehicle
accident; Primary emphasis was on knee injury
[AUTO; DYNAMICS; KNEE]
back to top
Miller,Robert A (1998): C. Nelson. Eugene, OR. 97401.
Evaluate injury potential falling from various heights; Evaluate and compare
to actual injuries suffered from falling off ski chair lift; Did testify
[DYNAMICS; FALL; INJURY]
Baker,Kandy L; Allstate (1998): Steven D. Bauers. Eugene, OR. 97440.
Low speed rear-end impact evaluation and analysis
[AUTO; COLLISION; REPORT]
Cantrill,David W; Cantrill,Skinner,Sullivan & King (1998): Thomson
v Klahr & Klahr. Boise, ID. 83701.
[EVALUATION; INJURY; WORKPLACE]
Hauser,Thomas F; MetLife Auto and Home (1998): Nicholson v Schultz. Lake
Oswego, OR. 97034.
Low speed rear-end impact; Evaluate likelihood of claimed injuries
[AUTO; EVALUATION; INJURY; REPORT]
Tait,James C; Tait & Associates (1998): Gration v Foster. Oregon City,
OR. 97045.
Moderate speed front-side impact; Evaluate claimed injuries relative to impact
force
[AUTO; EVALUATION; INJURY]
Hardman,Christopher R (1998): Tri vs El-Jechi.Portland, OR. 97205.
Low speed rear-end impact; Evaluate claimed injuries to low back and neck
[AUTO; EVALUATION; INJURY]
Riley,Andrew; Smith,Freed,Heald & Chock (1998): Cyrus v Lavign. Portland,
Oregon. 97204.
Moderate speed rear-end impact; Estimate and compare forces on low back from
collision and for other activities performed by claimant
[AUTO; COLLISION; REAR]
Atkins,Jeffrey R (1998): Edling v Hush Puppies. Dallas, Texas. 75234.
Evaluate shoe design and its possible effect on walking accident/injury
[DESIGN; INJURY; REPORT; SHOES; WALK]
Jones,Michael D; Met Life Auto & Home (1998): Speer v Paulson. Bellevue,
WA. 98004.
Low-speed rear end impact; Evaluate likelihood of claimed injuries
[AUTO; INJURY; LOW SPEED; REAR; REPORT]
Jones,Michael D; Met Life Auto & Home (1998): Moore v Mesa (SE059989).
Bellevue, WA. 98004.
Evaluate injuries of a low speed auto collision
[AUTO; INJURY; LOW SPEED; REAR; REPORT]
Hauser,TF; Met Life Auto & Home (1998): Kuh vs Carlson. Lake Oswego,
OR. 97034.
Low speed frontal impact; Evaluate claims relative to injuries
[AUTO; EVALUATION; FRONT; INJURY; REPORT]
Jones,Michael D; Met Life Auto & Home (1998): Stone vs Denney. Bellevue,
WA. 98004.
Low speed rear-end impact; Evaluate claims relative to statements and photos
provided
[AUTO; DYNAMICS; INJURY; LOW SPEED; REAR; REPORT]
Hauser,Thomas F; Met Home Auto & Life (1998): Buchalter v Rowe. Lake
Oswego, OR. 97034.
Low speed rear-end collision; Evaluate claims relative to auto damage (photos)
and statements
[AUTO; COLLISION; INJURY; REAR; REPORT]
Reisler,Steven A; Ogden,Murphy,Wallace (1998): Strong v Hyatt. Seattle,
WA. 98101-1686.
Slip and fall in bar with debris (peanuts & peanut shells) on floor; Evaluate
slip/trip scenarios to determine consistency between type of fall and injuries
[EVALUATION; FALL; INJURY; SLIP; TRIP]
Hauser,Thomas F; Met Life Auto & Home (1998): Peyton v Miller. Lake
Oswego, OR. 97034.
Relatively low change of speed accident involving a frontal/side impact; Numerous
claimed injuries including back, neck, shoulder and headaches
[AUTO; COLLISION; FRONT; INJURY; LOW SPEED; REPORT]
Noetzel,Ray; Met Life Auto & Home (1998): Russell v Hieb (SE056336).
Moreno Valley, CA. 92556-247.
Evaluate consistency of claimed injuries relative to impact
[AUTO; INJURY; LOW SPEED; REAR; REPORT]
Jones,Michael D; Met Life Auto & Home (1998): McGuffin v Hee (SE060861).
Bellevue, WA. 98004.
Low-speed rear end impact with minor lateral component; Evaluate accident relative
to claimed injuries
[AUTO; INJURY; KNEE; LOW SPEED; REAR; REPORT]
Myers,Michael D (1998): Sandberg v 1000 Broadway. Seattle, WA. 98101.
Evaluate fall on exit landing relative to building code requirements, adequacy
of warnings and human factors
[FALL; INJURY; REPORT; WARNING]
Michaels,Brian (1998): Turner v Sterling Hotels (Hilton) & Nordic
Track. Eugene, OR. 97401.
Determine cause of fall on exercise machine; Issues involved design, supervision,
and instruction and warnings
[DESIGN; FALL; REPORT; WARNING]
back to top
Henderson,Lisa M; Law Offices of T.E. Kranovich (1998): Johnson v City
of Portland et al.Lake Oswego, OR. 97035.
Evaluate injuries from multi-vehicle accident; Claimants vehicle was impacted
twice
[AUTO; COLLISION; INJURY]
Wing,Jeffrey C; Cole,Cary,Wing & Bloom (1998): Ficek vs Brucken. Eugene,
OR. 97401-2421.
Low speed rear-end impact analysis & evaluation
[AUTO; COLLISION; EVALUATION; REAR]
Gutsch,Kenneth M; Richmond & Quinn (1998): Duramus vs Red Samm, et
al. Anchorage, Alaska. 99501-2038.
Injury as a result of working near Case backhoe
[EVALUATION; INJURY; REPORT; WORKPLACE]
Gieger,Howard; Farmers Insurance Group (1998): Dixson vs Burkoff (88-105208).
Milwaukie, OR. 97267.
Accident involving vehicle impacting a cow; Evaluating injuries relative to
accident and compare with other activities performed
[AUTO; BACK; COLLISION; FRONT; NECK; REPORT]
Choate,Mark; Choate,Guinn,& Springmeyer (1998): Craig vs Gravely Int,
Inc / James Tool Rental. San Diego, CA. 92122.
Human factors evaluation of snowblower accident; Issues included design, instructions
and warnings
[DESIGN; ERGONOMICS; INJURY; REPORT; WARNINGS; WORKPLACE]
Brown,William E; Met Life Auto & Home (1998): Marsh vs Bonnet. Bellevue,
WA. 98004.
Single vehicle accident involving multiple rolls and impacts down an embankment;
Evaluate who was driving based upon vehicle dynamics and injuries of occupants
[AUTO; DYNAMICS; EVALUATION; INJURY; REPORT]
Wilson,V James; Thorp,Purdy,Jewett (1998): Gibbens v Viking Freight, Inc.
Springfield, OR. 97477-3367.
Evaluate biomechanics of fall off of 4 foot ledge and resulting head injury;
Develop animation data pertinent to accident
[EVALUATION; FALL; HEAD; INJURY]
Wobbrock,Lawrence (1998): Fisher v GVS Contracting, Inc. Portland, OR. 97205.
Investigate human factors aspects of fall from ladder; Evaluate effect of rung
height, adequacy of warnings, biomechanics of fall
[FALL; INJURY; WARNING]
Schuckman,Lawrence; Smith Freed Heald & Chock PC (1998): C Brown vs
Days Inns. Portland, OR. 97204.
Evaluate environment and identify possible risk factors related to a fall while
exiting a building with a step down immediately outside the door
[FALL; STEP; WARNING]
Hauser,TF; Met Life Auto & Home (1998): Akers vs Perez (SE 061 384
DJ). Lake Oswego, OR. 97034.
Low speed rear-end auto impact; Evaluate consistency of claims relative to
vehicle damage
[AUTO; COLLISION; REAR; REPORT]
Hauser,TF; Met Life Auto & Home (1998): Hartwig v Llano. Lake Oswego,
OR. 97034.
Low speed auto impact; Match claimed injuries to data
[AUTO; COLLISION; REAR; REPORT]
Hauser,Thomas F; Met Life Auto & Home (1998): Taylor v Rider. Lake
Oswego, OR. 97034.
Low speed rear-end impact; Match claimed injuries to known data
[AUTO; COLLISION; REAR; REPORT]
Hauser,TF; Met Life Auto & Home (1998): Steklenski v Miller. Lake
Oswego, OR. 97034.
Low speed rear-end auto impact; Evaluate claimed injuries relative to known
facts
[AUTO; COLLISION; EVALUATION; REAR; REPORT]
Jones,MD; Met Life Auto & Home (1998): Hutchinson v Terrana. Bellevue,
WA. 98004.
Low speed rear-end impact; Evaluate claimed injuries relative to known facts
[AUTO; COLLISION; LOW SPEED; REAR; REPORT]
Jones,Michael D; Met Life Auto & Home (1998): Foote v Rossitt. Bellevue,
WA. 98004.
Low speed rear-end auto accident; Evaluate claimed injuries relative to supplied
information
[AUTO; COLLISION; INJURY; LOW SPEED; REAR; REPORT]
Brown,Wm E; Met Life Auto & Home (1998): White vs Nelson. Bellevue,
WA. 98004.
Low-speed rear-end impact; Driver's recall of situation differed; Relate documented
vehicle damage to given scenarios
[AUTO; COLLISION; LOW SPEED; REAR; REPORT]
Brown,Wm E; Met Life Auto & Home (1998): Arkenzinis vs Allen. Bellevue,
WA. 98004.
Low-speed rear end impact; Match claimed injuries to data provided
[AUTO; COLLISION; INJURY; LOW SPEED; REAR; REPORT]
Brown,Wm E; Met Life Auto & Home (1998): Butler vs Fletcher. Bellevue,
WA. 98004.
Rear impact of one vehicle to another; Inconsistencies between vehicle repair
estimates; Evaluate likelihood of damage and injuries relative to crash dynamics
[AUTO; COLLISION; INJURY; REAR; REPORT]
Heatherman,Paul; Ray Babb & Associates (1998): Warren v Van Noppen.
Bend, OR. 97709.
Reconstructed high speed front collision; Determine injury mechanisms and evaluate
resulting injuries
[AUTO; COLLISION; FRONT; INJURY]
Craine,Diana; Craine & Love (1998): Caravity v Reynolds Metals. Lake
Oswego, OR. 97035.
Human factors/biomechanics issues regarding foreseeable use, instructions and
warnings; Accident involved a plastic wrap dispenser containing an exposed
sharp blade
[ERGONOMICS; INJURY; WARNING]
Ford,Kitri; Bryant Lovlien & Jarvis (1998): Stockton vs Kowalke. Bend,
OR. 97709-1151.
Low speed rear-end collision; Evaluate injuries relative to probably impact
[AUTO; COLLISION; DYNAMICS; INJURY; REAR]
Hauser,TF; Met Life Auto & Home (1998): Shirts v Wilson. Lake Oswego,
OR. 97034.
Evaluate dynamics of multiple car accident; Relate claimed injuries to impacts
[AUTO; COLLISION; DYNAMICS; INJURY; REAR; REPORT]
Hauser,TF; Met Life Auto & Home (1998): Gong v Wang. Lake Oswego,
OR. 97034.
Unrestrained passenger claiming injuries; Front end collision, 5mph; Evaluate
likelihood of claim relative to damage estimates
[AUTO; COLLISION; FRONT; INJURY; REPORT]
Delfino,Patrick F; Huppin,Ewing,Anderson & Paul (1998): Blair v Jeffries.
Spokane, WA. 99201-0826.
Low speed rear-end collision; Evaluate injuries relative to speed and dynamics
[AUTO; COLLISION; DYNAMICS; INJURY; REAR; REPORT]
Alexander,J Michael; Burt,Swanson Lathen et al (1998): J Halasz. Salem,
OR. 97301-3571.
Injury resulting from use of exercise equipment; Design issues were evaluated
[DESIGN; INJURY]
back to top
Stanford,Brad C; Farleigh,Wada Witt (1998): Stiles v Free Motion, Inc
et al. Portland, OR. 97204-3192.
Evaluate effect of board design on snowboarding accident; Evaluate injury and
determine how accident occurred
[DESIGN; EVALUATION; FALL; INJURY]
Brown,William E; Met Life Auto & Home (1998): Winther v Cunningham.
Bellevue, WA. 98004.
Minor rear end impact; Evaluate claimed injuries to statements and photos of
incident
[AUTO; COLLISION; INJURY; LOW SPEED; REAR; REPORT]
Brown,William E; Met Life Auto & Home (1998): Luong v Prahba. Bellevue,
WA. 98004.
Minor side impact, with dynamics similar to frontal; Evaluate claimed injuries
with respect to dynaimcs
[AUTO; COLLISION; DYNAMICS; FRONT; REAR; REPORT]
Brown,William E; Met Life Auto & Home (1998): Damm vs Chase. Bellevue,
WA. 98004.
Multiple (3) car crash including side impact; Ascertain effects of impact on
claimed injuries
[AUTO; COLLISION; DYNAMICS; FRONT; INJURY; REAR; REPORT]
Brown,William E; Met Life Auto & Home (1998): Lamson vs Sassaman/Kilmer.
Bellevue, WA. 98004.
Low speed rear end collision; Evaluate claimed injuries relative to dynamics
[AUTO; COLLISION; DYNAMICS; LOW SPEED; REAR; REPORT]
Brown,William E; Met Life Auto & Home (1998): Wagner vs Salois. Bellevue,
WA. 98004.
Low speed rear impact; Two passengers in fore- vehicle, claiming injuries;
Evaluate claimed injuries relative to collision dynamics
[AUTO; COLLISION; DYNAMICS; INJURY; LOW SPEED; REAR; REPORT]
Harms,Charles D; Mitchell,Lang Smith (1998): Hovenden v Evans. Portland,
OR. 97204-3230.
Low speed auto impact; Settled
[AUTO; LOW SPEED]
Madkour,Steven; Smith,Freed,Heald & Chock (1998): Gause v McQuillan
and Carter Wallace, Inc. Portland, OR. 97204.
Determine reasonableness of behavior of individual relative to driving performance
and effectiveness of securing a load to the roof rack of a truck
[AUTO; COLLISION; DYNAMICS; REPORT]
Lamb,Bradford H; Zaronski & Hill (1998): C Shine. Portland, Oregon.
97204.
Evaluate and determine likelihood of injuries caused by a swinging door at
a campground
[ERGONOMICS; HEAD; INJURY; REPORT; WORKPLACE]
back to top
|
