Human Performance and Wellness Inc  a professional scientific consulting firm.

HPW Logo

Litigation
.Services
.Expertise
.Cases
.Staff

Biomechanics
.Services
.Research
.Facilities

Other Services
.Footwear Testing
.Exercise Equipment

Home | About Us | Staff | Contact Us

Case List Summary: 2000

Chang,Adrian Y (2000): A Fajardo. Honolulu, HI. 96813.
Biomechanical/human factors evaluation of accident (finger amputation in closing door) involving performance and reaction time
[DYNAMICS; ERGONOMICS; INJURY; UPPER EXTREMITY]

Cavanagh,John S; Cavanagh & Zipse (2000): Schneider v Friscia/Boles. Portland, OR. 97223.
Evaluate low speed auto collision; Relate impact to claimed injuries
[AUTO; COLLISION; DYNAMICS; LOW SPEED; REAR]

Rasor,Mark; Farmers Insurance (2000): Schneider v Boles.Portland, OR. 97217.
Evaluate claimed injuries resulting from low speed rear end impact
[AUTO; COLLISION; INJURY; LOW SPEED; REAR]

Stubbs,Tyra H; Cantrill,Skinner et al (2000): Koch Agriculture v Express Services. Boise, ID. 83701.
Work place accident resulting in amputation by an auger; Human factors evaluation of training and operation
[ERGONOMICS; INJURY; WORKPLACE]

Lagesen,Frank H; Cosgrave Vergeer & Kester (2000): Lawson v Tillery. Portland, OR. 97204-3193.
Evaluate and relate effects of side-frontal impact on driver kinematics and claimed injuries
[AUTO; COLLISION; FRONT; INJURY; KINEMATICS]

Matson,Richard G; Bullivant Houser Bailey (2000): Descloux v Hidden. Vancouver, WA. 98660-2962.
Evaluate claimed injuries in a combined frontal/lateral impact
[AUTO; DYNAMICS; FRONT; INJURY]

Morgan,Dave; Tri-Met (2000): S Colbert (98-2533). Portland, OR. 97202.
Evaluate low back forces and claimed injuries resulting from a moderate speed frontal collision
[AUTO; BACK; BUS; COLLISION; FRONT; INJURY]

Foote,Jeffrey P; Jeffrey Foote and Associates (2000): L. Woodruff. Portland, OR. 97201.
Evaluate ATV accident; Determine speed and kinematics of operator as related to injuries
[ATV; INJURY; KINEMATICS]

back to top

Paradis,David B; Brophy,Mills et al (2000): Tron v Fred Meyer. Medford, OR. 97501.
Biomechanical/human factors evaluation of claimed back injury from reacting to a tipping chair
[BACK; ERGONOMICS; INJURY]

Stubbs,Tyra H; Cantrill,Skinner Sullivan King (2000): Haven v Hodge. Boise, ID. 83701.
Evaluate water burns on infant child for consistency with mother's explanation and child's abilites
[ANTHROPMETRICS; BALANCE; BURN; CHILD; DYNAMICS; INJURY]

Anderson,Ronald P; Schulte,Anderson Downes et al (2000): Wallace v State Farm. Portland, OR. 97204-3379.
Evaluate 3-vehicle accident; Determine order of impacts and possible effects on driver
[AUTO; COLLISION; DYNAMICS; INJURY]

Hooker,Brett; Country Companies (2000): Timma v Yaeger (186-966). Wilsonville, OR. 97070.
Evaluate claimed injuries associated with a low delta-v lateral/frontal side-swiping type auto impact
[AUTO; COLLISION; FRONT; INJURY; LOW SPEED; NECK]

Tugman,Sarah J Sally (2000): Thompson v Lynch. Anchorage, AK. 99501.
Auto accident; Evaluate relative to previous history/accidents
[AUTO; DEPO; INJURY]

Loomis,Don; Loomis & Howard (2000): Harwood v Howard Group. Eugene, OR. 97401.
Evaluate game and its potential cause of knee injury
[DYNAMICS; FALL; INJURY; KNEE]

Salerno,Terrence J (2000): Lesley v Ameristar Casino. Omaha, NE. 68134.
Biomechanical/human factors evaluation of trip and fall
[DYNAMICS; EXPECTATIONS; FALL; INJURY; PERCEPTIONS; TRIP; VISION]

Johnson,Edward G; Perkins Coie LLP (2000): Quinones v Spokane Transit Authority. Spokane, WA. 99201-3399.
Accident reconstruction and evaluation of possible injuries resulting from a bus-truck impact\
[AUTO; BUS; COLLISION; DYNAMICS; FRONT; INJURY]

McClain,Donald C; Tooze,Duden et al (2000): Karnes v Windsome Trading, Inc and Fred Meyer, Inc.Portland, OR. 97204-2496.
Biomechanics/human factors evaluation of fall from small stool; Determine consistency between injuries and fall
[FALL; INJURY; KNEE; SLIP; TRIP]

Brown,Annette; Sisson & Knutson (2000): C Nelson v Bootlegger Park Homeowner's Association. Anchorage, Alaska. 99501.
Biomechanics/human factors evaluation of a slip and fall; Evaluate injuries for consistency between this slip and fall and previous accident
[FALL; KNEE; SLIP; TASA; TRIP]

back to top

Stanford,Brad C; Farleigh,Wada Witt (2000): Murphy v Mt Hood Meadows.Portland, OR. 97204-3136.
Evaluate ski lift accident to determine biomechanics of fall from chair lift
[FALL; INJURY]

Matson,Richard G; Bullivant,Houser,Bailey (2000): Quintero v Newby. Vancouver, WA. 98660-2962.
Evaluate biomechanics of trip and fall and claimed injuries
[FALL; INJURY; TRIP]

McCormick,Kendra; Farmers Insurance Group (2000): T. Monroe (88-12936). Portland East B.C.O. Milwaukie, OR. 97267.
Evaluate claimed teeth and jaw injuries resulting from a medium-speed rear end impact
[INJURY; JAW; REAR; TEETH]

McClain,Donald C; Tooze Duden et al (2000): Erwin v US Bank (995002-1). Portland, Oregon. 97204-2496.
Biomechanical evaluation of a trip and fall; Evaluate visual and physical behavior relative to attentiveness and consistency of injuries relative to fall
[FALL; INJURY; VISION; WALK]

Zwingli,Laurie H; Kranovich,Thomas E (2000): Jiminez-Runner v Print Source. Lake Oswego, Oregon. 97035-0400.
Evaluate low speed rear end impact and claimed knee injuries
[AUTO; KNEE; LOW SPEED; REAR]

Larson,Jon C; Marvin,Chorzempa Associates (2000): Wooten v Bechtold and Wooten v Ford. Portland, OR. 97202-6464.
High speed frontal impact; Issues of seat belt adequacy, seat failure, warnings relative to pre-existing conditions and injuries suffered
[AUTO; COLLISION; FRONT; SEATBELT; WARNING]

Johnson,Arthur C; Johnson,Clifton et al (2000): Appler Estate v American Red Ball Transit et al. Eugene, OR. 97401-3176.
Occupant ejection analysis from impacted vehicle pushed over embankment
[AUTO; COLLISION; FRONT; KINEMATICS]

Cavanagh,John S; Cavanagh & Zipse (2000): Faren v LD Giles. Portland, OR. 97223.
Evaluation of claimed shoulder injury resulting from a low speed rear-end collision
[AUTO; COLLISION; DYNAMICS; LOW SPEED; UPPER EXTREMITY]

Paris,Wendy J; Cornell Paris & Dean (2000): Gardiner v Mayflower Transit. Portland, OR. 97204-1514.
Evaluate biomechanics of fall off of tipped bed and determine causal relationship between fall and injuries
[COLLISION; FALL; INJURY]

Burkey,Karen; Allstate Insurance (2000): Ginther (4284322692).Eugene, OR. 97440.
Evaluate a three-impact collision and determine the causal effect of the various collisions on the occupant's injuries
[AUTO; COLLISION; FRONT; HEAD; INJURY; KNEE; NECK; REAR]

Dailey,Kathleen M; Williams Dailey O'Leary (2000): Ayles. Portland, OR. 97204-1135.
Biomechanical evaluation of a fall and the resulting injuries of an elderly individual being assisted in transfer
[ELDERLY; FALL; INJURY; WALK]

Goodman,George W; Cummins,Goodman,Fish & Platt PC (2000): DPR Construction (A-3791). McMinnville, OR. 97128-0017.
Evaluate biomechanical/human factors components of an industrial fall and determine nature of fall
[FALL; INJURY; WORKPLACE]

Cantrill,David W; Cantrill,Skinner,Sullivan & King (2000): Robinson v Crosby Floral. Boise, ID. 83701.
Evaluate rear-end impact relative to claimed head, neck and mouth injuries
[AUTO; COLLISION; HEAD; INJURY; JAW; NECK; REAR]

Stout,Richard Alan (2000): Gravely v Home Depot USA, Inc. Portland, Oregon. 97201.
Evaluate human factors including expectations, vision and information processing associated with a trip and fall
[ERGONOMICS; EXPECTATIONS; FALL; R; TRIP; VISION; WORKPLACE]

back to top



 

Home | Litigation Services | Expertise | Cases
Biomechanics Services | Footwear Testing | Exercise Equipment | Research
Facilities | About Us | Staff | Contact

 

Human Performance & Wellness, Inc.
Main Corporate Office
3265 Chambers Street, Ste 200
Eugene, Oregon 97405-6004
541.683.1935
hpw@mail.com
Las Vegas Office
2022 Pinion Springs Drive
Henderson, NV 89074
702.450.4838;
Fax 702.450.2447
hpw@mail.com